Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Anger and Angst

My sympathy goes out to a group of students today who through no fault of their own have done a significant amount of work for what appears on the surface to be little reward. To cut a long story short, there were problems with one of the Universitys computer systems recently, and a knock on effect of this means that the assignment these students submitted has now been changed from a summative assessment to a formative one. Additionally it seems likely that some of the assessments yet to come will be re-weighted to account for the weighting lost due to the change of status from summative to formative. A fair result for those who couldn’t submit the assignment, less of a happy conclusion for some of those who did manage to get their assignment in.

Some words to these students before I go any further - No matter what the final outcome of this you haven’t lost as much as it seems you might have at the moment. You have studied the material and learned form it, you have the assignment and answers so you can study further if you need to, make use of these as you would have done had the whole thing worked as expected. Regarding the change of weighting for the rest of the assessments – They will spread 5.5% over another 4 assessments. Nothing will change in the questions you will get, nothing will change in the marking criteria, and whatever you would have scored in that assignment at the old weighting is what you will score under the new. You got a good score for this assessment and you aren’t sure you will do as well over the next 4? – Well the truth is you won’t if you let this episode impact on your learning, put your anger and emotion into a complaint to the university and then move on with your studies. You don’t have very good health and you’re concerned that you may not be as well for the next assessments as you were for this one? – letting this matter impact on you won’t help your health, if your health suffers your learning will suffer, put your anger and emotion into a complaint to the university and then move on with your studies, if you feel by the end of the course that your performance has been affected by this then fill in a PT39 and say so. And I can hear you there muttering because you don’t want the calm voice of reason, you want action, apologies, heads to role, your score back, any or all of the aforementioned – yes I know, and I can imagine were I in your situation I would feel the same. We give a lot of ourselves to our studies and for many of us it isn’t just brain power, knowledge and time that goes into any assignment it’s nerves and tension, angst and anxiety – to go through all that and then find you can’t submit, or your submission won’t count towards your final score must be a real blow for some, quite devastating for a few, rage inducing I imagine for others, I should think between you, you cover a vast range of negative emotions. I’m not trying to give you platitudes, or giving you a lecture about how you should get over it, I’m telling you as a fairly experienced student that if you don’t manage this it will spoil the course for you and may even affect it significantly – get all that negativity into a letter of complaint and then go back to your course, let the mechanisms of the university take over to resolve the situation, and just as importantly to prevent it happening again.


Complain

I love this university; I wouldn’t study any other way or with anyone else. I’ve been an O U student on and off since 1991/2 and in all that time they have never once let me down or given me cause for complaint. I’ve met other students who have had problems, but for me any problems have been either of my own making or the ‘life happens’ stuff.

My current position within the Students Association has given me in insight into more of the problems students face than I had before, and it has given me a certain insight into the systems and procedures in place within the University.

I firmly believe that the relevant departments are doing everything they can to provide an equitable solution for the students I’ve talked about in the section above. I don’t doubt that they will look to put systems and procedures in place to prevent such a thing happening again. I’m positive they are sorry this happened.

I’m less sure of a couple of things.

I’m not sure the University always appreciate how many people are upset/annoyed/de-motivated when problems occur. I know that they have figures about numbers on courses, so in the course I was talking about they know how many students were affected - but that doesn’t tell them how those students were affected as individuals. They rarely get to know stuff like that because we don’t tell them - we sound off in our course forums, we have a moan to fellow students at the next tutorial, we might say something to our tutor, some might even come to the Students Association to voice their anger, frustration, concerns – but we don’t often make an official complaint to record our dissatisfaction and advise them of the impact the event has had on us. If we have a valid reason to then we should complain, we should say how we feel, we should make them aware of the full impact the situation as had on us as a student.

I’m not sure the University appreciate the value of its complaints department. An organisation can learn more about itself from its complaints department that it can from any number of customer satisfaction questionnaires. Satisfaction questionnaires and unhappy events rarely coincide, so even if dissatisfaction is recorded on them it is often softened by the distance of time. Complaints generally occur fairly close in time to the event, they record not only the event itself and what the complainant thinks, they often include either a direct explanation of how the event made the complainant feel, or give a sense of that from the tone, language, etc. A sensible organisation not only analyses the hard data of the complaints it takes on board the softer more qualitative data. A clever organisation makes improvements to itself and retains its customers based on data which includes that available from its complaints department. A really smart organisation actively promotes its complaints department and encourages its customers to use it should they feel a need.

Thursday, February 08, 2007

Thinking out loud

I’ve long been a fan of the Internet and for many years now have used it not only as my primary method of communication but as my preferred medium for study, however over the New Year period my wonderful World Wide Web came crashing down around my ears when I lost my connection for nearly the whole month of January. As it happened I was between courses (though I did have some prep work it would have been useful to have access for) so the impact on my education was not as significant as it could have been, but it did make me stop and think. What if I had been mid course? I mean I’m not talking a couple days or even a couple of weeks without access here, but nearly four whole weeks. What if I had actually been on that web applications course that I’d thought of doing over the winter? Four weeks out of a twelve week course is a long time and the chances of being able to catch up are slim to none, even with a full 60 point course losing a month from it can have serious repercussions. And much as I like to think I’m an individual I appreciate that I am not unique. If I can lose my connection for so long then it can happen to other students too; which poses the question – what happens if a student can’t access their course materials for a significant period?

Can they change presentations? Can they plead special circumstances come exam time? Can they have their money back? The truth is there isn’t a simple answer to any of these questions (well apart from the “can I have my course fees back?”). It depends on the course, the time of year (in the sense of how far through the course you might be) and possibly it depends on which way the wind is blowing at the time – which on reflection is quite worrying. Now I’d like to make it clear here that I don’t have definitive answers to any of my questions because posing hypothetical questions to someone at the other end of the phone when the whole set up is designed to deal with concrete problems and situations is fraught with difficulty, and the while the person I spoke to did their best to try and help, the best they could come up with was that every circumstance would be taken into account should the need arise. Reassuring, but not definitive.

So should I be concerned? The university is making its continued push forward with the Virtual Learning Environment, more and more courses have at least an online element, and while I understand that I make my choice to study online completely voluntarily, the choice to do so or not is becoming more and more difficult for many as our university moves into its e-business/e-learning future. While I understand the arguments put forward about the university having to change and adapt if it is to survive in an increasingly competitive higher education market, I also know that in the virtual world as in the real one – life happens.

Sunday, November 26, 2006

Student Senate Reference Group

Representation from the regions is an important part of the make up the Open University Students Association (OUSA). Regions are where the students are and it is important that those students are allowed to have their voices heard by the university. One way of ensuring the voice of students from the regions reaches the university by enabling those voices to feed into the governance structure. Senate is the highest tier of the Academic Governance structure and students have six seats on Senate.

In order to ensure that regional voices feed into Senate OUSA negotiated a student body called the Senate Reference Group. This group meets prior to Senate (usually from about 10.30am) to discuss issues, go through the papers, and allows the six students going forward to the actual Senate meeting to take with them opinions and views form a wider student perspective. Following the pre Senate meeting there are usually workshops on issues of current interest to the student body and sometimes presentations by various departments of the university.

Amongst other student representatives on the student Senate Reference Group each region is entitled to send one appointed representative. Applications are now invited from students within the region. All current students are invited to consider applying for the position in their region. As well as attending the Senate Reference Group meetings detailed below, the representatives will also be invited to attend OUSA Regional Forum meetings in their own region. Travel expenses (and where necessary over night accommodation) will be paid for all meetings attended. Senate Reference Group members are expected to feed back to their region on events and outcomes of the day.

Scope of Group: advising student representatives sitting on Senate (the University's academic governance body) on issues involving regulating the University’s programmes of study, admissions, research, teaching and awards as well as monitoring, steering, reviewing and determining academic policy

No. of representatives: one per region

Length of Term: September 2006 to September 2007

No. of meetings: 4 per year (provisionally but may be more)

Timings of meetings: weekdays

Venue of meetings: Milton Keynes


Requirements of OUSA Representatives

  • Interest in advancing student needs
  • Ability to summarise important points for reporting back to regional forums
  • Ability to put across points and deal with questions
  • Time to spare and flexibility to attend all group meetings
  • Attendance at 3-4 OUSA Regional Forum meetings (usually weekends held locally within the region) per year
  • Submission of reports to Regional Forum meetings
  • Awareness of OUSA policy (desirable)
  • Experience of committees (desirable)
  • Experience of dealing with people at all levels (desirable)


To Apply

Please complete and sign the Application Form for Appointment to Regional Committees clearly stating that it is Senate Reference Group that you are interested in. The completed form should then be sent to the OUSA office at PO Box 397, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6BE, to arrive no later than the 1st December 2006.

Appointments will be made by the OUSA Regional Forum and will be based on suitability and experience of applicants for these important positions. Applications from inexperienced representatives and new students are welcome as training will be given.

For further information on this, and other representation opportunities within OUSA, please contact the OUSA office or your local Regional Forum.